Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 04:45

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
I Got Ultherapy Instead of a Face-lift - The Cut
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Instant analysis: Andreyanov has impressed CBJ brass - NHL.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
European leaders worry they’re too reliant on U.S. tech - TechCrunch
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Stefon Diggs won’t discuss the contents of his bag on the boat - NBC Sports
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What do you think of Obito Uchiha?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Sixers go center again in 2nd round, draft Johni Broome - NBC Sports Philadelphia
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.